πŸ§ͺ Run this tool

βš™οΈ Advanced options

Advanced controls are available for this tool and still bounded for abuse protection.

πŸ“˜ Excessive Explanation

🧩 Technical Details

What this tool checks

  • Presence and quality of high-impact security response headers.
  • Policy coverage scoring for transport, framing, and content restrictions.
  • Redirect-aware validation to detect posture loss on intermediate hops.

How to read the output

  • Result Summary gives an at-a-glance posture score and risk class.
  • Overview lists missing or weak headers with immediate priorities.
  • Technical Details provides normalized header map per hop.
  • Raw Output supports security review and release validation logs.

Common failure patterns

  1. Missing HSTS or frame controls leaves known browser attack paths open.
  2. CSP policy too permissive to meaningfully reduce script injection risk.
  3. Header drift between origin and CDN causes inconsistent security behavior.
  4. Redirect chains strip security headers before final destination.

Remediation workflow

  1. Define baseline security headers at edge and enforce consistency.
  2. Roll out stricter CSP in staged mode with reporting and tuning.
  3. Align origin overrides with edge defaults to avoid conflict.
  4. Re-test after each policy or routing deployment.

Next steps

❓ Frequently asked questions

Can a high score guarantee no web vulnerabilities?

No. Header posture is one layer; secure coding and patch management remain required.

Why include redirect hops in analysis?

Security posture can degrade on intermediate responses before the final page.

Should all security headers be set in application code?

Many teams set stable defaults at edge and apply targeted app-level overrides.

How often should this check run?

At every release and after CDN, proxy, or policy changes.

Is CSP rollout risky?

Yes if rushed. Use report-first mode and incremental tightening.